<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the art of losing love, pt.2: seiichi furuya and christine gössler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-space-in-between.com/2004/10/28/the-art-of-losing-love-pt2-seiichi-furuya-and-christine-gossler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-space-in-between.com/2004/10/28/the-art-of-losing-love-pt2-seiichi-furuya-and-christine-gossler/</link>
	<description>"...that accident which pricks me (but also bruises me, is poignant to me)."</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Barry</title>
		<link>http://the-space-in-between.com/2004/10/28/the-art-of-losing-love-pt2-seiichi-furuya-and-christine-gossler/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-space-in-between.com/?p=17#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I very much enjoyed your posting on Furuya, intruiging and written with such sensitivity. I am writing a thesis on intimacy and disclosure in photographic portraiture and Furuya is one of the artists i am considering. I do not have a copy of the Christine Memories, though i have ordered one. In the meantime, i was wondering if you might be able to reccomend some alternative sources. i have "the Model Wife" and some press cuttings, as well as the other "memories" books, but what would be really excellent would be articles and essays from art-publications. do you know of any such material, including the issue and volume numbers of the magazines / or authors and publishers of any books? i would be enormously grateful. thank you kindly,

alex B
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I very much enjoyed your posting on Furuya, intruiging and written with such sensitivity. I am writing a thesis on intimacy and disclosure in photographic portraiture and Furuya is one of the artists i am considering. I do not have a copy of the Christine Memories, though i have ordered one. In the meantime, i was wondering if you might be able to reccomend some alternative sources. i have &#8220;the Model Wife&#8221; and some press cuttings, as well as the other &#8220;memories&#8221; books, but what would be really excellent would be articles and essays from art-publications. do you know of any such material, including the issue and volume numbers of the magazines / or authors and publishers of any books? i would be enormously grateful. thank you kindly,</p>
<p>alex B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marlaina</title>
		<link>http://the-space-in-between.com/2004/10/28/the-art-of-losing-love-pt2-seiichi-furuya-and-christine-gossler/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>marlaina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-space-in-between.com/?p=17#comment-39</guid>
		<description>your writing is so intelligent. I am very interested on how one can love a person who is in love with the idea os their death, how futile does your projected love become when you see it being so loveingly rejected.

very interesting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your writing is so intelligent. I am very interested on how one can love a person who is in love with the idea os their death, how futile does your projected love become when you see it being so loveingly rejected.</p>
<p>very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efrain</title>
		<link>http://the-space-in-between.com/2004/10/28/the-art-of-losing-love-pt2-seiichi-furuya-and-christine-gossler/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Efrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2004 20:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-space-in-between.com/?p=17#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Through other fotoblogs I ran into yours today. . .I would like to encourage you to continue posting so thoughtfully about the work of photographers you admire. . .I plan to visit often. Thanks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through other fotoblogs I ran into yours today. . .I would like to encourage you to continue posting so thoughtfully about the work of photographers you admire. . .I plan to visit often. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VV Veen</title>
		<link>http://the-space-in-between.com/2004/10/28/the-art-of-losing-love-pt2-seiichi-furuya-and-christine-gossler/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>VV Veen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 20:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-space-in-between.com/?p=17#comment-37</guid>
		<description>a) i love reading your "thoughtful" writing, borrowing/burrowing in les restes de roland barthes.



and quick comments, idea-notes, back in kind (my own borrowing/burrowing):



eros: the absent center of (photographic) ontology:



even the letter "i" implies this: le point (period in french) is what? a hole. a gap. a his-story.  it is a pause w/o return: a black-hole, a shit-hole, the shit-hole, the point of no-return, no escape: here is the quandry of the colonial present, which is the due returns of our constant deferral of the present into the past: the sublime ideology of anality, or life in reverse: a photograph?



quotes i wanted to share from my recent life: (historical co-incidences)



-- the jap. photographer who does the devasted landscapes said that even if photography goes entirely digital, he thinks its essential subject will still be light.



and then! today! (when you least expect "it"):



"Now if we ask about the character of the physical element which painting uses, the answer is that it is light [italicized] as what makes visible universally the whole world of objects."



hegel, lectures on fine arts, book iii, section iii



a bientot


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a) i love reading your &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; writing, borrowing/burrowing in les restes de roland barthes.</p>
<p>and quick comments, idea-notes, back in kind (my own borrowing/burrowing):</p>
<p>eros: the absent center of (photographic) ontology:</p>
<p>even the letter &#8220;i&#8221; implies this: le point (period in french) is what? a hole. a gap. a his-story.  it is a pause w/o return: a black-hole, a shit-hole, the shit-hole, the point of no-return, no escape: here is the quandry of the colonial present, which is the due returns of our constant deferral of the present into the past: the sublime ideology of anality, or life in reverse: a photograph?</p>
<p>quotes i wanted to share from my recent life: (historical co-incidences)</p>
<p>&#8211; the jap. photographer who does the devasted landscapes said that even if photography goes entirely digital, he thinks its essential subject will still be light.</p>
<p>and then! today! (when you least expect &#8220;it&#8221;):</p>
<p>&#8220;Now if we ask about the character of the physical element which painting uses, the answer is that it is light [italicized] as what makes visible universally the whole world of objects.&#8221;</p>
<p>hegel, lectures on fine arts, book iii, section iii</p>
<p>a bientot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
